Starting to notice a clear divide between new photographers and people in the industry for a long time. It's definitely not apparent on this forum at all. Just wanted to put that in there. However, I'm a member of a long standing stock agency and sometimes you need to ask questions on the forum.
My employer used an image of mine without my consent in a 500 run publication in a half page spread. This would have netted me about £400 if they had gone through the agency. I then found out that they are going to run it in a financial publication for about 1300 people. I've said I don't want my image used at all, and they think this is me being silly and stubborn.
I asked about my options on the other forum and while some were helpful, a lot of them were not. I posted the image in question and all I really got was abuse. Some comments are below.
"Don't give up your day job"
"Anyone could have taken that with a compact"
"The building is leaning, is it falling down too?"
The image was of rubble with my works building in the background. Not going to post it cause I deleted it from Flickr because I was also taunted about using Flickr. "You are on here moaning about someone using your image without consent and you use Flickr?"
Apparently I've not served enough time in photography to warrant demanding anything for my images. There's some 10,000 hours rule with photographers.
I try not to get too hot under the collar with this sort of thing, but it can really cripple your drive. Also apparently it's frowned upon to work full time and do photography on the side.
I am kind of lost with all of this and actually can't believe that this industry can be so cruel to new comers. It's certainly fired me down to the bottom of the ladder in terms of confidence and can't help but believe that there is probably some truth in their thoughts, as it echoes quite widely across different forums with regards to new folk.
Is this the sort of thing I'm getting myself into? I'm not on to seek validation for my work at all, or want anyone to pick me off the gravel after this fall but It's making me review my future procedures on sharing and work ethic.
Paul
My employer used an image of mine without my consent in a 500 run publication in a half page spread. This would have netted me about £400 if they had gone through the agency. I then found out that they are going to run it in a financial publication for about 1300 people. I've said I don't want my image used at all, and they think this is me being silly and stubborn.
I asked about my options on the other forum and while some were helpful, a lot of them were not. I posted the image in question and all I really got was abuse. Some comments are below.
"Don't give up your day job"
"Anyone could have taken that with a compact"
"The building is leaning, is it falling down too?"
The image was of rubble with my works building in the background. Not going to post it cause I deleted it from Flickr because I was also taunted about using Flickr. "You are on here moaning about someone using your image without consent and you use Flickr?"
Apparently I've not served enough time in photography to warrant demanding anything for my images. There's some 10,000 hours rule with photographers.
I try not to get too hot under the collar with this sort of thing, but it can really cripple your drive. Also apparently it's frowned upon to work full time and do photography on the side.
I am kind of lost with all of this and actually can't believe that this industry can be so cruel to new comers. It's certainly fired me down to the bottom of the ladder in terms of confidence and can't help but believe that there is probably some truth in their thoughts, as it echoes quite widely across different forums with regards to new folk.
Is this the sort of thing I'm getting myself into? I'm not on to seek validation for my work at all, or want anyone to pick me off the gravel after this fall but It's making me review my future procedures on sharing and work ethic.
Paul
Comment