Otters

[Stan]

BWC yesterday, these are both mine and Dees

Stan

1/250, f7.1, ISO 800, 250mm

otter by Neptuno.Photography, on Flickr

1/1000, f 5.6, ISO 400, 420mm

otters * by Neptuno.Photography, on Flickr


otter * by Neptuno.Photography, on Flickr

[Alan_H]

Re: Otters

Stan 3 brilliant pictures again number 2 is the best for me

What are the magenta spots in the eyes and nose

Alan

[colin C]

Re: Otters

Number 2 for me also Stan.

[Montana 5]

Re: Otters



Great set Stan and Dee.

Doug.

[Dave s]

Re: Otters

Smashing set 1 for me

[Fr1so]

Re: Otters

I find number 1 the best. Question for Colin and Alan_H, why do you find number 2 the best? Is that because both of the otters watch the direction? Or is it something else?

[Stan]

Re: Otters

Thanks guys

What are the magenta spots in the eyes and nose

the light i think, its there on the raw as well

I find number 1 the best. Question for Colin and Alan_H, why do you find number 2 the best?

I like no 1 as its the one i shot but the second i thong is the otter shot of the day of the ones i have looked at so far aminly because its probably the most difficult shot to get - two otters together, a good pose and both looking at the camera - that one of course is Dees'

Stan

[mistral105]

Re: Otters

Excellent set Stan - Regagrds John

[DeeGee]

Re: Otters

Number two for the expressions. Can think of several captions for that one.

[tesarver]

Re: Otters

Another vote on the 2nd image Stan

Tom

[Stan]

Re: Otters

Thanks John, Di and Tom

Dee wins as usual

Stan

[Brian Sugden]

Re: Otters

A great set with #2 being my favourite, although I would clone out the high lights on the rear leg.

Brian

[mikep]

Re: Otters

Nice shots Stand and Dee!

Weird that purple colour in the eye! I went yesterday, and 1 of my shots has it too, so it must be something on the Otter, or the way the light reflects!

Nice set. Mike.

[Stan]

Re: Otters

although I would clone out the high lights on the rear leg.

cheers Brian, missed that

Weird that purple colour in the eye! I went yesterday, and 1 of my shots has it too, so it must be something on the Otter, or the way the light reflects!

there are a few of ours that are the same, there in the raw before any processing, can only think it is the light

Stan