Having just returned from a holiday in Florida, and long days walking around the attractions, with the 5D3 + EF 24-105 attached, I thought that it would be nice to reduce the weight tad. However, having progressed to owning all L series lenses, I really don't want to go down the lower priced, and lighter, alternatives route.
I got to thinking that having the 24-105L, 70-300L, and 400L, I had an overlap in focal length between the 24-105 and the 70-300. and that maybe the EF 24-70L, being some 70g lighter, might be a good option.
Of course there are two 24-70L options, the f/4 and the new f/2.8 version 2, albeit a very significant difference in the price.
Although the 2.8 would be nice, it is 135g heavier than the 24-105 that I have, so somewhat defeats the object of what I am trying to achieve.
I have no complaints with the 24-105, and love the lens, its only the wish to retain L series image quality in a lighter package, that has prompted my thinking.
I have approached three dealers for a part-ex quote, and have received already received a good offer from one of them.
So, does anybody have experience of the EF 24-70L f/4?
Dave
I got to thinking that having the 24-105L, 70-300L, and 400L, I had an overlap in focal length between the 24-105 and the 70-300. and that maybe the EF 24-70L, being some 70g lighter, might be a good option.
Of course there are two 24-70L options, the f/4 and the new f/2.8 version 2, albeit a very significant difference in the price.
Although the 2.8 would be nice, it is 135g heavier than the 24-105 that I have, so somewhat defeats the object of what I am trying to achieve.
I have no complaints with the 24-105, and love the lens, its only the wish to retain L series image quality in a lighter package, that has prompted my thinking.
I have approached three dealers for a part-ex quote, and have received already received a good offer from one of them.
So, does anybody have experience of the EF 24-70L f/4?
Dave
Comment